Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 29/2025

Case between Sunilkumar et al vs Radhakrishnan regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-14
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sunilkumar and his wife Santy Sunil petitioned for eviction of Radhakrishnan due to non-payment of rent for a leased property. The court found the petitioners' claims valid and allowed the eviction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction based on the evidence presented, including non-payment of rent and the petitioners' bonafide need for the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent/tenant within 30 days
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petioners established their case with unrebutted oral testimony and lease evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows:- The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sunilkumar (60 years years) Kolappillil House, Ponnurunni, Thammanam P.O., Poonithura Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, PIN-682032 Santy Sunil (56 years years) Kolappillil House, Ponnurunni, Thammanam P.O., Poonithura Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, PIN-682032

Defendants

Radhakrishnan (48 years years) No. CC.45/8 G, 2nd Floor 'Kolappillil Edifice', Ponnurunni, Vytilla Thammanam Road, Ernakulam, Kerala

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners seek eviction of the respondent from the leased property.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows:- 1. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners are entitled to get the costs of the petitions from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioners are entitled to get the costs of the petitions from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the leasing terms between the petitioner and the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice demanded payment of arrears and initiated the eviction process.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of the sending of the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases