| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1156 - 1160 of 1217

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Aboobakar vs Abdul Salam et al regarding property delivery

Execution Petition

EP 160/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-12-07

0 years, 5 months, 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Chattikkal Usman's children et al vs Majeed and others regarding execution of decree

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 122 of 2016

Tirur

2016-11-30

Not mentioned

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ayishakutty Umma et al vs Kousukutty regarding Execution of Property Delivery

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 202 of 2016

Tirur

2016-11-11

10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Majeed vs Sulaiman regarding Rent Control

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 46 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-09-28

2 years

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Chandran vs Sulochana regarding property delivery

Execution Petition

EP 128/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-11-11

0 years, 5 months, 18 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

190

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

37%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear or lacked representation during hearings, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 37 cases (37%) High Impact

Not Pressed by Counsel

Cases were dismissed as petitioners' counsel chose not to press claims or appeared unprepared.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs commonly failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Failure to Comply with Procedure

Plaintiffs often did not adhere to necessary procedural requirements, leading to the rejection of their petitions.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence

Not Pressed by Counsel

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Comply with Procedure

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?