Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Execution Petition No. 202 of 2016

Case between Ayishakutty Umma et al vs Kousukutty regarding Execution of Property Delivery

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SMT VINCY.T.V., B.A., LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2016-11-11
Duration
10 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Four petitioners filed an execution petition under order 21 Rule 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking property delivery against the respondent Kousukutty, resulting in the delivery of the property and closure of the execution petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the execution petition and ordered the delivery of the property, resulting in the closure of the execution petition.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property delivery
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Property delivered. Delivery effected. Hence EP closed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Ayishakutty Umma (70 years) D/o. Kizhakkumpatt Thenutty Musliyar Kadeeja (40 years) D/o. Kizhakkumpattu Abdul Rehiman Abdul Majeed (37 years) S/o. Kizhakkumpattu Abdul Rehiman Abdul Gafoor (32 years) S/o. Kizhakkumpattu Abdul Rehiman Abdul Majeed (30 years) S/o. Kizhakkumpattu Abdul Rehiman Fthima (58 years) W/o. Abdul Hameed

Defendants

Kousukutty (75 years) W/o. Kizhakke Peedikakkal Kunhavaran, Naduvattom amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Property Delivery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Execution of property delivery against the respondent
Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery effected. Hence EP closed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Fri, 11/11/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases