Case Summary
Four petitioners filed an execution petition under order 21 Rule 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking property delivery against the respondent Kousukutty, resulting in the delivery of the property and closure of the execution petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property delivery
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the execution petition and ordered the delivery of the property, resulting in the closure of the execution petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery effected. Hence EP closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ayishakutty Umma
- Party Age
- 70
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kadeeja
- Party Age
- 40
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Majeed
- Party Age
- 37
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Gafoor
- Party Age
- 32
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Majeed
- Party Age
- 30
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fthima
- Party Age
- 58
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kousukutty
- Party Age
- 75
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Property Delivery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Execution of property delivery against the respondent
Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery effected. Hence EP closed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ayishakutty Umma et al vs Kousukutty regarding Execution of Property Delivery
Case Code Year
Case between Ayishakutty Umma et al vs Kousukutty regarding Execution of Property Delivery