Case Summary
Two petitioners sought execution petition under order 21 Rule 11(2) r/w, 38 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the respondent for delivery, resulting in the EP being closed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Execution petition delivery
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court delivered the execution petition, resulting in the closure of the EP.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Delivery effected. EP Closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Koyakutty
- Relation
- S/o. Kuruvayil Saidalikkutty
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kizhakepeediyekkal Alavi's Son Hamza
- Relation
- Legal heir of R10
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kausukutty
- Relation
- W/o. Kunhavaran
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Execution petition delivery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Court delivered the execution petition
Evidence:
Delivery effected. EP Closed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Koyakutty et al vs Kausukutty regarding execution petition under Civil Procedure Code
Case Code Year
Case between Koyakutty et al vs Kausukutty regarding execution petition under Civil Procedure Code