| Niyamam AI

Displaying 611 - 615 of 1218

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between K H Ramlath Nazer vs Apex India Education and Charitable Trust et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 73/2022

Ernakulam

2025-11-04

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Lalithamma Radhakrishna Menon vs Cheranellor Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 922/2021

Ernakulam

2025-11-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Roby K. Skariah vs Merin Paul regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 143/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Salam et al vs C.M. Subair regarding fair rent

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 98/2021

Ernakulam

2025-12-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sree Narayana Seva Yogam Kanjiramattom et al vs Majeed.P.M. regarding Eviction

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 188/2019

Ernakulam

2025-12-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

191

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

44%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absent Parties and Lack of Representation

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear or provide representation during hearings, which led to case dismissals.

Found in 44 cases (44%) High Impact

Petitions Not Pressed or Withdrawn

Many cases were dismissed because petitioners did not press their claims or withdrew them without sufficient reasons.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prove Essential Elements

Plaintiffs often could not establish crucial aspects, such as landlord-tenant relationships or required statutory grounds.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Faulty Documentation and Procedures

Cases were dismissed due to improper documentation or failure to comply with court procedures and requirements.

Found in 13 cases (13%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absent Parties and Lack of Representation

Petitions Not Pressed or Withdrawn

Failure to Prove Essential Elements

Faulty Documentation and Procedures

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?