| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 86 - 90 of 319

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Abdu Rahman vs Ajeesh regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Unknown

S.T. No: 174/2017

2019-11-15

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Abdu Rahman vs Ajeesh regarding offense under U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

ST No: 183/2017

TIRUR

2019-11-15

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd et al vs Jayaraj. M.U regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

ST 66/2017

2019-11-11

2 years 11 months 17 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Fasil vs Ishaq regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. 173/2017

TIRUR

2019-12-12

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Saidhali vs Faisal regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No: 15/2018

2019-11-12

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

25%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 319 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 2.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Cheque (in 72 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 36 cases)
Postal receipt (in 26 cases)
Cheque Return Memo (in 21 cases)
Original Cheque (in 17 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 81
Defendant Won: 209

209

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

57%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Complaint Withdrawal by Complainant

Numerous cases resulted in acquittal due to the complainant withdrawing the complaint.

Found in 57 cases (57%) High Impact

Failure to Prove Key Evidence

Plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish essential elements of their case.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Complainant's Absence in Court

Cases were dismissed or acquitted due to the complainant's repeated absence from court proceedings.

Found in 13 cases (13%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Legal Procedure Fees

Complaints were dismissed due to lack of necessary process fees for legal proceedings.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Complaint Withdrawal by Complainant

Failure to Prove Key Evidence

Complainant's Absence in Court

Insufficient Legal Procedure Fees

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?