Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. 01/2023

Case between Navaratna Financial corporation vs Kenson Varghese regarding dishonour of cheque

Court
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – V
Judge
Smt. Indu P Raj
Order Date
2025-11-28
Duration
approximately-3 years 19 days
Case Code No.
01
Case Closed
Fri, 11/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The complainant, Navaratna Financial corporation, alleges that the accused, Kenson Varghese, dishonoured a cheque issued for loan repayment. The court found the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The accused was found guilty and sentenced to one month of simple imprisonment and a fine of ₹1,27,800. If the fine is not paid, an additional two months of imprisonment will apply.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Fine of ₹1,27,800 and one month imprisonment.
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused was found guilty and sentenced to one month of simple imprisonment and a fine of ₹1,27,800. If the fine is not paid, an additional two months of imprisonment will apply.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The complainant provided substantial documentary evidence confirming the dishonouring of the cheque and the existence of a legally enforceable debt.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The complainant has produced substantial documentary evidence establishing the existence of the liability, issuance of the cheque, its dishonour, and failure to pay after notice.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused is convicted under Section 255(2) Cr.P.C. (1) He is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one (1) month and to pay a fine of ₹1,27,800/-.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Navaratna Financial corporation
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kenson Varghese
Party Age
54
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque bearing No.622216 dated 05.10.2020, Dishonour memo, Copy of notice dated 19.10.2020, Promissory Note, Partnership Deed, Copy of account statement.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jose Joseph K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Eldho Abraham Kuriakose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The complainant requested compensation for the dishonoured cheque.
Evidence:
The entire fine amount of ₹1,27,800/- shall be paid to the Complainant as compensation under Section 357(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The accused is sentenced to simple imprisonment for non-payment of the cheque.
Evidence:
He is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one (1) month and to pay a fine of ₹1,27,800/-.
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
In default of payment of fine, additional imprisonment is imposed.
Evidence:
In default of payment of fine, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of two (2) months.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque was issued by the accused towards repayment of a loan and was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Dishonour memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The memo confirms that the cheque was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice was issued to the accused demanding payment after the cheque was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the dispatch of the notice to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The promissory note executed by the accused for the loan taken.
Reference:
Ext.P6
Document Type: Partnership Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the registered partnership firm of the complainant.
Reference:
Ext.P7
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Registration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document acknowledges the registration of the complainant's firm.
Reference:
Ext.P8
Document Type: License
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The license confirms the legality of the complainant’s money lending activities.
Reference:
Ext.P9
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the transactions between the complainant and the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P10
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A copy of the cheque issued by the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P11
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A certificate related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.P11(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2023

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
1 month

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Fri, 11/06/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 11/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Malankara Plantation Limited vs Suresh S regarding dishonour of cheque
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – V
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s QCRETE READY MIX INDIA PVT LTD vs George M Philip regarding dishonor of cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – V
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Mrs.Thasni Mayin regarding offence under section 138 of NI Act.
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Mr. John V.V. regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I Act
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sanju Raju vs Rajesh P.R. regarding offence punishable U/s. 138 of N.I Act
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won