Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. 69/2021

Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Mrs.Thasni Mayin regarding offence under section 138 of NI Act.

Court
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration
approximately-1 year 6 months
Case Code No.
69
Case Closed
Fri, 06/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. filed a complaint against Mrs.Thasni Mayin for dishonor of a cheque issued to them. The court found the accused guilty of the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found the accused guilty and imposed a fine for the offence committed under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The accused is sentenced to pay a fine of ₹71,840/-.
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court found the accused guilty and imposed a fine for the offence committed under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The complainant established that the accused issued a cheque towards legally recoverable debt.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The complainant established that the accused issued a cheque towards legally recoverable debt.
Supporting Evidence
It can be safely concluded that the accused has issued Exhibit P6 cheque in discharge of legally recoverable debt.

Judgment Evidence:

The accused is found to have committed the offence punishable under section 138 of NI Act. The accused is sentenced to pay a fine of ₹71,840/- (Rupees seventy one thousand eight hundred and forty only).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.R. Sibu
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs.Thasni Mayin
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Extract from the minutes of the Board of Directors, Promissory note, Debt acknowledgment, Guarantee deed, Statement of account, Cheque, Dishonour memo, Lawyer’s notice, Postal receipt, Acknowledgment card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Roy Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Michael James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Imposition of fine on the accused.
Evidence:
The accused is sentenced to pay a fine of ₹71,840/-.
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Default imprisonment for non-payment of fine.
Evidence:
In default, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 1(one) month.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque was issued by the accused in discharge of a legally enforceable debt.
Reference:
P6
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The promissory note executed by the accused's husband establishes the debt owed.
Reference:
P2
Document Type: Debt acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the acknowledgment of the debt by the accused.
Reference:
P3
Document Type: Guarantee deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the guarantee arrangement involving the accused.
Reference:
P4
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the arrears owed by the accused's husband to the complainant.
Reference:
P5
Document Type: Dishonour memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates that the cheque issued was dishonored due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
P7
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the accused regarding the dishonor of the cheque.
Reference:
P8
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the lawyer's notice to the accused.
Reference:
P9
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of the receipt of the lawyer's notice by the accused.
Reference:
P10

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2021

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
1 month

Quick Facts

Location
KOTTAYAM
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/05/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 06/13/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Malankara Plantation Limited vs Suresh S regarding dishonour of cheque
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – V
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Neethu Viswanathan regarding dishonour of cheque under N.I Act
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between M/s QCRETE READY MIX INDIA PVT LTD vs George M Philip regarding dishonor of cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – V
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Mr. John V.V. regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I Act
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sanju Raju vs Rajesh P.R. regarding offence punishable U/s. 138 of N.I Act
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won