| Niyamam AI

Displaying 51 - 55 of 594

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Nidhin Babu vs Prasanth regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.185/2024

Vaikom Taluk

2025-09-19

approximately-1 year 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Gentleman Finance Partnership vs Dineshkumar M.P. regarding offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case

ST-28/2020

Vaikom

2025-05-12

approximately-7 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between V.P. Jawahar vs Afsal B regarding offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Criminal Case

ST-24/2023

Vaikom

2025-06-10

approximately-6 years 8 months 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rajeevan K.V vs Jayanthi T.K regarding offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case

ST-124/2019

Vaikom

2025-01-04

approximately-6 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Gentleman Chits Funds Company (India) Private Ltd. vs Aswathy P.P. regarding offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Criminal Case

ST-22/2020

Vaikom

2025-04-30

approximately-6 years 4 months 17 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

First page
Previous page
…
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
…
Next page
Last page

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

37%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 594 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Cheque (in 220 cases)
Postal receipt (in 136 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 87 cases)
Cheque Return Memo (in 83 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 67 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 222
Defendant Won: 342

342

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

54%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Withdrawal of Complaint by Plaintiff

Most cases resulted from the complainant voluntarily withdrawing their complaint, leading to the defendant's acquittal.

Found in 54 cases (54%) High Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

In several cases, the complainant failed to present adequate evidence to support their claims, resulting in acquittal.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Complainant's Absence in Court

The absence of the complainant during court proceedings led to the acquittal of the accused in multiple instances.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Medium Impact

Lack of Legally Enforceable Debt

The plaintiff often could not prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt concerning the cheque.

Found in 8 cases (8%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Withdrawal of Complaint by Plaintiff

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Complainant's Absence in Court

Lack of Legally Enforceable Debt

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?