Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST-28/2020

Case between The Gentleman Finance Partnership vs Dineshkumar M.P. regarding offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, VAIKOM
Judge
Miss. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-05-12
Duration
approximately-7 years 3 months
Case Closed
Mon, 05/12/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a complaint filed by The Gentleman Finance Partnership against Dineshkumar M.P. for defaulting on a loan repayable via a cheque. The complaint alleges that the cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found the defendant guilty of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and imposed a sentence of simple imprisonment along with a monetary fine.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment till rising of the court and to pay a fine of ₹1,80,000/-
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court found the defendant guilty of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and imposed a sentence of simple imprisonment along with a monetary fine.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The complainant successfully proved the issuance and dishonour of the cheque along with compliance to statutory requirements.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The complainant successfully proved the issuance and dishonour of the cheque along with compliance to statutory requirements.
Supporting Evidence
The factual basis for raising presumption has been established by the complainant satisfactorily and it is obligatory on the part of the Court to raise presumption u/s 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment till rising of the court and to pay a fine of ₹.1,80,000/- (Rupees One Lakh eighty Thousand only) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Gentleman Finance Partnership
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anilkumar K.G
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dineshkumar M.P.
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney dated 02.03.2022, Cheque bearing No.405803 dated 20.12.2016 for Rs.1,00,000/- drawn on State Bank of India, Arunnoottimangalam Branch, Memo dated 12.01.2017, Memo dated 10.01.2017, Office copy of lawyer's notice dated 09.02.2017, Postal Receipt dated 09.02.2017, A/D card dated 13.02.2017
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv.Sri.N Sreejith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Sri.Aneesh Gopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Fine imposed on the accused for the offence under Section 138.
Evidence:
Accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment till rising of the court and to pay a fine of ₹1,80,000/- under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Simple imprisonment for the accused.
Evidence:
In default, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked as evidence to support the complainant's case.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the accused to discharge liability.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Memo
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Indicates that the cheque was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Memo
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Indicates that the cheque was received unpaid by the complainant's bank.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sent to the accused for the cheque's dishonour.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.P6
Document Type: A/d Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of receipt of the lawyer's notice by the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P7

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between The Gentleman Finance Partnership vs Dineshkumar M.P. regarding offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
Case Code Year
Case between The Gentleman Finance Partnership vs Dineshkumar M.P. regarding offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
3 months

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Mon, 07/09/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 05/12/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vadakkumcore Chit PVT Ltd. vs Haris regarding cheque dishonour.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Vaikom
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Gentleman Chits Funds Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Pratheesh Manoharan K. regarding Offence under N.I. Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, VAIKOM
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between The Central Financial Credit and Investments Co-operative India Ltd. vs Shimla Suneer regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, VAIKOM
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Nobi vs Rasheed P.S regarding dishonor of cheque under N.I. Act
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, VAIKOM
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between The Central Financial Credit and Investment Co-operative India Ltd. vs Gladson K.V regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, VAIKOM
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won