| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 466 - 470 of 1355

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Metro Bankers vs Vishnu K et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O. S. No.347/2019

Perumbavoor

2025-11-29

approximately-7 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Binda Karnan Pvt. Ltd. vs Chellayil Udhesan regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS.93/2025

2025-11-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Global Capital Credit Perumbavoor vs Bibin P Chandran, Vilasini Chandran regarding realisation of money due under a hire-purchase transaction.

Civil Suit

OS.71/2024

2025-10-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Speed Pack vs LINK and PARK regarding money recovery.

Civil Suit

O. S. No.346/2024

Perumbavoor

2025-10-17

4 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Deepam Granite Industries vs Antony Titus regarding realisation of amount for supply of materials

Civil Suit

O. S. No.397/2019

2025-10-16

6 years 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

83%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,355 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 11%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 193 cases)
Statement of Account (in 187 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 173 cases)
Loan Application (in 128 cases)
Postal receipt (in 101 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1120
Defendant Won: 173

173

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay the required batta, resulting in dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence or Non-Representation of Plaintiff

Petitions were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence or failure to represent the case adequately.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence of Means to Pay

Case dismissals occurred because plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence of respondent's means to pay, leading to failures.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Required Documents

Dismissing cases where plaintiffs did not submit necessary documentation to support their claims.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence or Non-Representation of Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence of Means to Pay

Failure to Produce Required Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?