Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
C.S. 26/2023

Case between Canara Bank, Perambra Branch vs Sheethal.P.K regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Judge
Sri. Priyanka. S.
Order Date
2025-08-18
Duration
approximately-6 years 5 months
Case Code No.
26
Case Closed
Mon, 08/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank is the plaintiff, represented by its manager, who claims that the defendant, Sheethal.P.K, has defaulted on a loan of Rs.11,73,080/-. The defendant did not appear in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.11,73,080/- along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of Rs.11,73,080/- with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.11,73,080/- along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's claim stands proved due to unrebutted testimony and documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's claim stands proved due to unrebutted testimony and documentary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
From the unrebutted testimony of PW1 coupled with Exts. A1 to A5, it is found that the plaint claim stands proved and the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1) The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of Rs.11,73,080/- (Rupees eleven lakh seventy three thousand and eighty only) with interest at the rate of 14.25% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank, Perambra Branch
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheethal.P.K
Party Age
31
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement cum deed of hypothecation dated 20.03.2019, Promissory note dated 20.03.2019, Acknowledgment of debt dated 25.09.2020, Statement of accounts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.P.Sasidharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Ramachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay the total outstanding amount with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1) The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of Rs.11,73,080/- (Rupees eleven lakh seventy three thousand and eighty only) with interest at the rate of 14.25% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
2) The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendant and her assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff bank as part of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff bank to secure the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment by the defendant of the debt owed to the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of accounts maintained by defendant showing the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another statement of accounts showing the due amount from the defendant to the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
C.S.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Case Filed
Wed, 03/20/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 08/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank, Pandeerkkara Branch vs Arun Kumar. K.M et al regarding money recovery
COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank, Perambra Branch vs Arathi. A K. et al regarding loan recovery
COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank, Perambra Branch vs Govindan (Died) et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank, Koothali Branch vs Abdul Nazar.K regarding realization of money
COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank, Arikkulam Branch vs Rageesh.T.M et al regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won