Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Commercial Suit No. 21/2024

Case between Canara Bank Branch-II vs Rekha. M.P regarding realization of money

Court
Commercial Court
Judge
Smt.Priyanka S.
Order Date
2025-10-13
Duration
approximately-3 years
Case Closed
Mon, 10/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against Rekha M.P for the realization of a loan amounting to Rs. 13,04,924/- due to default in payment. The court found the plaintiff's claims substantiated by evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 13,04,924/- with interest for the loan default.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay Rs. 13,04,924/- with interest.
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 13,04,924/- with interest for the loan default.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence adduced by the plaintiff stands unchallenged.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence adduced by the plaintiff stands unchallenged.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence adduced by plaintiff stands unchallenged. From the unrebutted testimony of PW1 and PW2 coupled with Exts. A1 to A11, it is found that the plaint claim stands proved.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1) The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of Rs.13,04,924/- (Rupees thirteen lakhs four thousand nine hundred and twenty four only) with interest at the rate of 11.50% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank Branch-II
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rekha. M.P
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application, Sanction Memorandum, Receipt, Composite Hypothecation Agreement, Acknowledgment of debt, Lawyer Notice, Postal receipt, Bank Account statement.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. K.L. Sreedevi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1)The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of Rs.13,04,924/- (Rupees thirteen lakhs four thousand nine hundred and twenty four only) with interest at the rate of 11.50% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs from the defendant.
Evidence:
2)The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendant and her assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The loan application was submitted as part of the evidence supporting the loan granted by the plaintiff to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The sanction memorandum outlines the terms of the loan that was sanctioned to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The receipt acknowledges the transaction related to the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt further confirms the payment related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Composite Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The hypothecation agreement details the collateral for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document acknowledges the debt owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further acknowledgment confirming the defendant's debt.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This acknowledgment reconfirms the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another acknowledgment of the outstanding debt.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The lawyer notice serves as a formal communication regarding the overdue payment.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the sending of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A10(a)
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card received confirming receipt of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A10(b)
Document Type: Bank Account statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The account statement details the outstanding balance due from the defendant as of the specified date.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Commercial Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank Branch-II vs Rekha. M.P regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank Branch-II vs Rekha. M.P regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Koyilandy
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Case Filed
Tue, 10/11/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 10/13/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Federal Bank, Koorachundu Branch vs Varkey. T.C regarding loan recovery
IN THE COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The South Indian Bank Limited vs Proprietor, M/s Skyway Travels Poonoor regarding realization of money
Court of the Judge, Commercial Court - Koyilandy
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s A.M. Creations regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE JUDGE, COMMERCIAL COURT - KOYILANDY
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Fortune Trade Links et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE JUDGE, COMMERCIAL COURT - KOYILANDY
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Midhun Velayudhan et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE JUDGE, COMMERCIAL COURT - KOYILANDY
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won