| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 356 - 360 of 1355

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between UCO Bank vs Naseela Navas et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 92/2025

Ernakulam

2025-07-16

approximately-8 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Ronnie Associates vs Mr. Shafeed regarding Suit For Realization of Money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 586/2022

Ernakulam

2025-07-17

approximately-5 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Novelty Textiles vs M/s Biju Wedding Centre et al regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1275/2024

Ernakulam

2025-07-17

approximately-1 year 2 months 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Anshad Kallukulam regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1307/2024

Ernakulam

2025-07-17

approximately-3 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda et al vs Binu B M regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1336 / 2024

Ernakulam

2025-07-17

approximately-8 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

83%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,355 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 11%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 193 cases)
Statement of Account (in 187 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 173 cases)
Loan Application (in 128 cases)
Postal receipt (in 101 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1120
Defendant Won: 173

173

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple cases dismissed for failing to pay the necessary court fees or batta.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs often lacked sufficient evidence demonstrating respondents' means to pay debts or other claims.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court during hearings or trials.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

No Representation for Plaintiff

Many cases ended in dismissal due to the plaintiff not being represented by legal counsel.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Failure to Provide Evidence

Absence of the Plaintiff

No Representation for Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?