Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 356 - 360 of 756

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between The Vettom Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. vs Manaf and Others regarding debt satisfaction

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 257/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-12

1 year, 9 months, 25 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank et al vs Shahul Hameed regarding unspecified matter

Unknown

EP 79/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-08

0 years, 3 months, 4 days

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary vs Saidalavi and Moideen regarding loan closure

Civil Suit - Loan Closure

EP 336/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-06

1 year, 7 months, 25 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vettom Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. vs Vikraman et al regarding loan repayment

Execution Proceeding - Loan Repayment

EP 270/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-05

1 year, 9 months, 14 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Velayudhan Thekinkattil regarding loan closure

Civil Suit

EP 63/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-03

0 years 3 months 1 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

69%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 756 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.1 years

Settlement Likelihood 20%

Common Winning Factors:

Loan Application (in 50 cases)
Agreement (in 42 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 41 cases)
Statement of Accounts (in 30 cases)
Acknowledgment of Debt and Security (in 26 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 525
Defendant Won: 150

150

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to defaults in multiple cases.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's repeated absence during hearings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press Claims

Some plaintiffs failed to actively pursue their claims, leading to occasions where suits were dismissed as not pressed.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Press Claims

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?