| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 201 - 205 of 1355

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Roopesh Kamath regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1092 of 2023

Ernakulam

2024-03-21

approximately-3 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Anilkumar V.G regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 84 of 2021

Ernakulam

2024-03-21

approximately-4 years 3 months 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India vs Sri. Arvind Kumar regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 285 of 2021

Ernakulam

2024-03-21

approximately-6 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Aswas S.S vs Aldi Preman regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 229/2021

Ernakulam

2024-03-23

approximately-3 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Prasanth.T.S. regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.883/2018

Ernakulam

2024-03-23

approximately-5 years 8 months 7 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

83%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,355 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 11%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 193 cases)
Statement of Account (in 187 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 173 cases)
Loan Application (in 128 cases)
Postal receipt (in 101 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1120
Defendant Won: 173

173

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Petitions were frequently dismissed for failing to pay the required batta or court fees.

Found in 38 cases (38%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Many cases were dismissed as plaintiffs failed to appear or lacked proper representation during hearings.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence regarding the means of the respondents to pay debts.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Case Not Pressed by Plaintiffs

Several suits were dismissed because plaintiffs did not actively pursue their cases or press charges.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Lack of Evidence Presented

Case Not Pressed by Plaintiffs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?