Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 232/2022

Case between Union Bank of India vs Anjumol C.P., Purushothaman C.M. regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smt. Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
approximately-13 years 11 months
Case Code No.
232
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Union Bank of India filed a suit against Anjumol C.P. and Purushothaman C.M. for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the sanctioned educational loan amount and the bank sought legal recourse.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover ₹3,59,776.35 and future interest from the defendants. The court stated that the defendants failed to prove their defense against the claims of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize ₹3,59,776.35 along with future interest at the rate of 14% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover ₹3,59,776.35 and future interest from the defendants. The court stated that the defendants failed to prove their defense against the claims of the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff bank proved that the defendants borrowed the loan and failed to repay it as agreed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff bank proved that the defendants borrowed the loan and failed to repay it as agreed.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff succeeded in proving that the defendants' contention that they had not borrowed ₹3,00,000/- from the plaintiff bank is groundless, by producing these documents.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize ₹3,59,776.35.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anjumol C.P.
Party Age
31
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Purushothaman C.M.
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Omana Purushothaman
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chinjumol C.P.
Party Age
29
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jinjumol C.P.
Party Age
23
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Application form for education loan, Educational loan agreements, Educational loan guarantee letter, Sanction letter, Promissory note, Debit balance confirmation letters, Statement of account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Clareness Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Soni Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mathew Jacob
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.R. Shaji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize ₹3,59,776.35 from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize ₹3,59,776.35.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Application Form for Education Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the application for an educational loan for the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Educational Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the terms of the educational loan sanctioned to defendants 1 and 2.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Educational loan guarantee letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Guarantees the loan executed by the 3rd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the acceptance of terms and conditions by defendants 1 and 2 regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the promise of defendants 1 and 2 to repay the loan with interest.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Debit balance confirmation acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledges the outstanding amount of ₹2,80,112.86 as of 20/08/2014.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Debit balance confirmation acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the outstanding amount of ₹2,60,383.66 as of 10/08/2017.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Debit Balance Confirmation letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows acknowledgment of liability signed by defendants 1 to 3 as of 10/06/2020.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the outstanding balance of ₹3,59,776.35 as on 30/04/2022.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the formal demand for repayment made to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provide proof of mailing the lawyer’s notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirm receipt of the lawyer’s notice by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally Taluk, Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Fri, 09/23/2011 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Josbish Kurian regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Joshy George regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Anilkumar K.K. et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Jayakumar P.N. regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Anishkumar K.C. regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won