Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 303/2023

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Josbish Kurian regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-06-16
Duration
approximately-4 years 7 months
Case Code No.
303
Case Closed
Mon, 06/16/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff is Kerala Gramin Bank seeking to recover loan amount from the defendant, Josbish Kurian. The defendant availed a loan but failed to repay despite multiple notices.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of the loan amount with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.2,03,837/- along with interest and costs of the suit
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of the loan amount with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff presented sufficient evidence of the loan agreement and the defendant's failure to repay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff presented sufficient evidence of the loan agreement and the defendant's failure to repay.
Supporting Evidence
These documents are sufficient to show the liability of the defendant towards plaintiff bank and the commitment to repay the loan amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.2,03,837/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Three Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty Seven only) as on the date of suit...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Josbish Kurian
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application dated 09.11.2020, Memorandum of Agreement for Agricultural Loan, office copy of lawyer’s notice, postal receipt, unserved returned notice, certified copy of loan account ledger.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joy K. George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.A. Muhammed Shameer
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.2,03,837/- from the defendant along with interest.
Evidence:
Hence the court is of the view that the plaintiff is entitled for a decree for recovery of money.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the application for the loan availed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Memorandum of Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the terms of the loan agreement between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Office Copy of Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates that the plaintiff had issued a legal notice to the defendant demanding repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of postage for the notice sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Returned Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the legal notice sent to the defendant was returned unserved.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified copy of loan account ledger
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document contains the details of the loan account held by the defendant with the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally Taluk, Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Mon, 11/09/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/16/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Anjumol C.P. et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Joshy George regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Anilkumar K.K. et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Jayakumar P.N. regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Anishkumar K.C. regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won