| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1526 - 1530 of 2449

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s. Anugraha Auto Financiers vs Neethu T K @ Neethu Aji et al regarding money suit

Civil Suit

O. S. No.273/2024

Perumbavoor

2025-08-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Kemi Veneers vs M/s. Evergreen Plywood and Hardware regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O. S. No.332/2022

Perumbavoor

2025-08-14

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between A A Haneefa vs Noushad regarding money recovery

Civil Suit

O. S. No.166/2024

Perumbavoor, Ernakulam District

2025-08-16

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd vs Jisha Joby et al regarding money recovery

Civil Suit

O.S. No.379/2019

Perumbavoor

2025-08-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Omega Sales Corporation vs Aleena Plywoods regarding recovery of amount for building materials supplied.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.357/2024

Perumbavoor

2025-07-11

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to not paying the necessary batta for processing their petitions.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence during hearings, leading to default judgments.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Failure to Cooperate

Several cases were dismissed because plaintiffs did not cooperate with required legal procedures or representation.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence

Failure to Cooperate

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?