Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O. S. No.273/2024

Case between M/s. Anugraha Auto Financiers vs Neethu T K @ Neethu Aji et al regarding money suit

Court
The Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-08-13
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Anugraha Auto Financiers filed a suit against Neethu T K and others for the recovery of outstanding dues from a vehicle loan. The defendants defaulted on their repayment obligations despite repeated demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding amount along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay a sum of 2,89,950/- with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the case through uncontroverted evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff a sum of 2,89,950/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Eighty-Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty only) together with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

P V Jayan (64 years) Pottackal House, Perumbavoor P O, Kanjirakkadu Kara, Perumbavoor Village, Pin – 683 542

Defendants

Neethu T K @ Neethu Aji (34 years) Parunthamkunnel House, Vengoor P O, Vengoor Kara, Vengoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Pin: 683 546 Aji P Shankar (44 years) Parunthamkunnel House, Vengoor P O, Vengoor Kara, Vengoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Pin: 683 546 Nandini Shivasankaran (67 years) Parunthamkunnel House, Vengoor P O, Vengoor Kara, Vengoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Pin: 683 546

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order for the defendants to pay the plaintiff a sum of 2,89,950/- along with interest.
Evidence:
The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff a sum of 2,89,950/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Eighty-Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty only) together with interest...
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the cost of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the cost of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partnership Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the legal standing of the plaintiff as a registered partnership firm.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Registration of Firm
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the registration of the plaintiff firm.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the terms under which the loan was granted to the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Office copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of the demand for payment made to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves that the notice was sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: A/d Card submitted
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the acknowledgment of receipt by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Loan Ledger
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Records the financial transactions related to the loan provided to the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases