Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.379/2019

Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd vs Jisha Joby et al regarding money recovery

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd. has filed a suit against Jisha Joby and others for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendants defaulted on loan repayments taken for a business loan disbursed in 2017.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest. The suit was decreed for the recovery of the amount claimed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants are jointly and severally directed to pay the plaintiff a sum of 95,580/- with interest at 12% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest. The suit was decreed for the recovery of the amount claimed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved that the loan transaction was duly executed and that the defendants defaulted on the repayment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved that the loan transaction was duly executed and that the defendants defaulted on the repayment.
Supporting Evidence
The fact that the plaintiff company is registered under the Companies Act and carries on non-banking financial business is established from the documents on record, and the mere allegation of lack of authority remains unproved.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendants are hereby jointly and severally directed to pay to the plaintiff a sum of 95,580/- (Rupees Ninety-Five Thousand Five Hundred and Eighty only) with interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manojkumar
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajan A U
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jisha Joby
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joby U L
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Salvin Jose
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Demand Promissory Note, Agreement, Office copy of the Lawyer notice
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Belsson Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T V Eldho
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V G Sajeev Panicker
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aneesha Mani
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are directed to pay the plaintiff a sum for the outstanding loan amount.
Evidence:
The defendants are hereby jointly and severally directed to pay to the plaintiff a sum of 95,580/- (Rupees Ninety-Five Thousand Five Hundred and Eighty only)...
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the cost of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the cost of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was essential in proving the loan transaction and the terms of repayment agreed upon by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement outlines the terms of the loan, including the repayment schedule and interest applicable.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Office copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent demanding repayment from the defendants and is critical for establishing that the defendants were informed of their dues.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This resolution was relevant to show the authority of the Manager to represent the plaintiff company in legal matters.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves to further clarify the authority of the Manager in connection with the transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Copy of personal ledger
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This ledger document tracks the payments made and the outstanding balance owed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd vs Jisha Joby et al regarding money recovery
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd vs Jisha Joby et al regarding money recovery

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Wed, 11/27/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises et al vs Shibu P Paul et al regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Speed Pack vs Arafa Marketing regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Speed Pack vs Babiyos Marketing regarding recovery of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd vs Nishad M.M., Najeeba Nishad, Ibrahamkutty M.M. regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Global Enterprises regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won