Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 103/2019

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Global Enterprises regarding realization of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-02-17
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 02/17/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against M/s Global Enterprises for the recovery of a loan amount due to default in payments. The court found in favor of the bank based on the evidence provided.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of Canara Bank, ordering M/s Global Enterprises to pay the outstanding amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants are directed to pay the amount of Rs. 4,06,802/- along with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of Canara Bank, ordering M/s Global Enterprises to pay the outstanding amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff proved that the defendants were liable to repay the loan.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff proved that the defendants were liable to repay the loan.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff along with the documents marked as Ext.A1 to A9 proves the case of the plaintiff that the defendants are liable to pay the amount due.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The defendants are hereby directed to pay the amount of Rs. 4,06,802/- along with 12% per annum as interest from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum, till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Global Enterprises
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application dated 27.02.2017, Sanction memorandum dated 23.02.2017, Agreement cum deed of hypothecation dated 03.03.2017, Letter of undertaking dated 03.03.2017, Deed of hypothecation dated 03.03.2017, Statement of account dated 27.02.2019, Office copy of notice dated 21.04.2017, Office copy of lawyer notice dated 05.10.2017.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.S. Bastin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.M. Alias
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount of Rs. 4,06,802/- along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The defendants are hereby directed to pay the amount of Rs. 4,06,802/- along with 12% per annum as interest from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum, till realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the plaintiff's claim of the loan application submitted by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the terms under which the loan was sanctioned to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the formal agreement that detailed the hypothecation of assets as security for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document reflects the defendant's commitment to repay the loan as per the agreed terms.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document formalizes the hypothecation arrangement in relation to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides a record of the financial transactions related to the loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Office Copy of Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document acts as evidence of the plaintiff's demand for repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of official communication from the plaintiff's lawyer demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Certified Copy of Proceedings
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the court's official record regarding the proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Global Enterprises regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Global Enterprises regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor, Ernakulam District, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Thu, 02/14/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 02/17/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Metro Bankers vs Vishnu K et al regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Sandra Sabu et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Ranjith K.N. regarding realisation of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Ansiya Ummer et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shiji Murukadas et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won