| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4411 - 4415 of 22054

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Bijo Isaac et al vs Mathew Joseph et al regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1412/2015

Ernakulam

2024-10-30

approximately-9 years 6 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vipin et al vs Baby C.M et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 531/2017

Ernakulam

2024-02-09

approximately-6 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.P.Abhayakumar vs Vidyodaya Trust et al regarding Suit for money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 769/2017

Ernakulam

2026-01-14

approximately-8 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Dileep Kumar T.P vs T.R.Suresh regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 849/2021

2024-02-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Tiny Chacko vs Sonny Kurian regarding declaration and mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1290 of 2019

2024-02-14

approximately-5 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9721

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Plaintiffs failed to pay required batta fees, leading to dismissal for default in many cases.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of necessary evidence to support claims resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

No Steps Taken by Plaintiff

Plaintiffs frequently failed to take necessary procedural steps, causing their petitions to be dismissed.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Many cases were dismissed when the plaintiff was not present to represent their case.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken by Plaintiff

Absence of Petitioner in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?