| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4426 - 4430 of 22062

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Smt.Thankamma vs Muraleedharan regarding declaration and partition of property.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1508/2019

Ernakulam

2024-02-17

approximately-4 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank Of India vs Mathews.P.C. et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.506/2023

Ernakulam

2024-02-17

approximately-3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Sanal Soman regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 611 of 2022

2024-02-17

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Gratis Interior Solution Pvt. Ltd vs Bhaveesh.M regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 630 of 2022

Ernakulam

2024-02-17

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K. Sureshchandran vs Tripunithura Merchant’s Union et al regarding declaration and injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.823/2017

Ernakulam

2024-02-17

approximately-6 years 8 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9724

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

33%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 33 cases (33%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to present adequate evidence to support claims resulted in dismissals across multiple petitions.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Multiple cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during hearings or court appearances.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken for Action

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary procedural steps, causing their cases to be dismissed.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of Petitioner

No Steps Taken for Action

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?