Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1290 of 2019

Case between Tiny Chacko vs Sonny Kurian regarding declaration and mandatory injunction

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-02-14
Duration
approximately-5 years 7 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Tiny Chacko and Antony M.C, are seeking a declaration of civil death for M.A Chacko, who has been missing for over 12 years, and an injunction against the first defendant, Sonny Kurian, to prevent him from trespassing on their inherited properties. The court recognizes the plaintiffs as the legal heirs of M.A Chacko.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit has been decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, declaring the civil death of Mr. M.A Chacko and recognizing the plaintiffs as legal heirs entitled to inherit his properties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Declaration of civil death of Mr. M.A Chacko and injunction against the first defendant from trespassing on the properties.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, declaring the civil death of Mr. M.A Chacko and recognizing the plaintiffs as legal heirs entitled to inherit his properties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient evidence of the plaintiffs' entitlement to the assets based on the long period of Mr. Chacko's absence and the legal heirship certificate.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient evidence of the plaintiffs' entitlement to the assets based on the long period of Mr. Chacko's absence and the legal heirship certificate.
Supporting Evidence
According to PW1, her husband M.A.Chacko is not known for the last 12 years. The presumption of civil death arises under Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act due to the husband being missing.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: A) It is hereby declared the civil death of Mr. Chacko, S/o Antony as he is missing from 02.07.2007.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Tiny Chacko
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Antony M.C
Party Age
19
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sonny Kurian
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anu Chacko
Party Age
29
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Legal heirship certificate dated 24.02.2016, Sale deed No.1129/1991, Will No.54/1991.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abraham.P.George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ratheesh M.B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Johny Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration of the civil death of Mr. Chacko as he is missing since 02.07.2007.
Evidence:
It is hereby declared the civil death of Mr. Chacko, S/o Antony Mampilly House, 32/502 G, Rose Garden Colony, LPS road, Pallinada, palarivattom, pin 682025 as he is missing from 02.07.2007.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration that plaintiffs and 2nd defendant are the legal heirs of Mr. M.A. Chacko.
Evidence:
It is hereby declared that plaintiffs and 2nd defendant are the legal heirs of Mr. M.A. Chacko, S/o Antony, Mampilly House, 32/502 G, Rose Garden Colony, LPS road, Pallinada, Palarivattom, pin 682025 and they have inherited the title, ownership and possession of the schedule item No.1 to 8 properties in the capacity as legal heirs of Mr. M.A.Chacko.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the 1st defendant from trespassing into the plaint schedule properties.
Evidence:
The 1st defendant is hereby restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule properties and commit any act of waste therein.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Sale deed was presented as evidence regarding the property owned by M.A.Chacko and the 1st plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Gift deed No. 2256/2016 was marked to support the claim pertaining to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Will
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Will No. 55/1991 was proved through the witness and was pertinent to establish ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Report from Njarakal Police regarding the missing person case was included to establish the presumption of death.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Legal heirship certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal heirship certificate was presented to prove the legal status of the plaintiffs as the heirs of M.A.Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Death certificate was marked to conclude the proceedings regarding the presumption of death for M.A.Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another death certificate was presented as part of the documentation supporting the claims in the case.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Oral evidence was provided by the plaintiffs through witnesses PW1, PW2, and PW3 to support their claims.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Tiny Chacko vs Sonny Kurian regarding declaration and mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Tiny Chacko vs Sonny Kurian regarding declaration and mandatory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 09/17/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won