| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1831 - 1835 of 21903

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Avaneendhran vs Latha Rani et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.386/2022

Kozhikode

2025-09-29

approximately-3 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 396/2024

Kozhikode

2025-09-29

approximately-3 years 4 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Moidu Haji vs Mohammed Niyas regarding eviction and realization amount.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.350/2025

Kozhikode District

2025-09-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sree Krishana Bankers vs Binu. M regarding money recovery

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 150/2025

Kozhikode

2025-09-29

approximately-2 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ismayil. T.K vs Shabeer. A.P regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 180/2018

Kozhikode

2025-09-29

approximately-7 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9649

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay requisite fees for court processes, resulting in dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence

Many plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's failure to appear in court as required.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Petitioners often failed to take necessary steps to issue notices to the opposing party, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?