Case Summary
This suit involves Popular Associates, a collection agency, seeking payment from defendants Shankar and Anupama who are employees of Orange Retail Finance. The plaintiff claims that the defendants have failed to pay for services rendered despite repeated demands.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit, stating that the defendants, being employees of the company, are not personally liable for the claims made by the plaintiff. There was no order as to costs.
Key Reasoning:
The defendants were found not liable as they were not signatories to the agreement and were only employees of the company.
The defendants were found not liable as they were not signatories to the agreement and were only employees of the company.
Why Defendant Won:
The defendants were found not liable as they were not signatories to the agreement and were only employees of the company.
The defendants were found not liable as they were not signatories to the agreement and were only employees of the company.
Supporting Evidence
The suit against the defendants in the party array cannot be decreed. The defendants are not even signatories to the exhibit A1 agreement.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is dismissed. There is no order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Popular Associates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shankar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anupama
Plaintiffs Documents
Collection agency agreement, invoice for amount due, lawyer notice.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.T.Dileep
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Hamna.K.P
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Muhammed Musthafa.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Claim for realization of money from the defendants.
Evidence:
The suit against the defendants in the party array cannot be decreed. The suit is liable to be dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Collection Agency Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement between the plaintiff and Orange Retail Finance India Private Limited regarding collection services.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Invoice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice sent to the defendants for the amount due for services rendered.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Legal Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of legal notice demanding payment from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Legal Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of legal notice demanding payment from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of sending the legal notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of sending the legal notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card from the second defendant confirming receipt of the notice.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type:
Article Tracking Details
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tracking details of the notice sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Popular Associates et al vs Shankar, Anupama regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Popular Associates et al vs Shankar, Anupama regarding realization of money.