| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18216 - 18220 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Beepathu vs Ashraf et al regarding permission to sue as indigent persons

Original Petition

ORIGINAL PETITION (Pauper)No. 102 OF 2016

2019-07-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Asir. M vs Kunhu Mohammed. P regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No:29/2018

Tirur

2019-07-26

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kunhi Moidu vs Hassain regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No:57/2018

Tirur

2019-07-26

null

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Saleem Kappithottathil vs Vasudevan regarding money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 230 OF 2018

2019-07-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shanil vs Ayisha et al regarding injunction.

Injunction

Original Suit No. 255 OF 2018

Tirur

2019-07-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple petitions were dismissed for failure to pay batta required for processing the case.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove the opposing party's means.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Default for Non-Representation

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence and lack of representation in court.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Petitions were dismissed for failing to take necessary steps to issue notices to the required parties.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default for Non-Representation

Failure to Issue Notice

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?