| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1591 - 1595 of 21896

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Ayissu vs Nellyamkandi Mammu et al regarding eviction of tenants

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 7/2025

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District

2025-08-02

approximately-2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Thaivacha Madamballi Kunhammadi Haji vs Neelamparambath Mammootty regarding arrears of rent

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 120/2023

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala

2025-08-04

approximately-4 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between KARIMBIL ABDULKHADAR HAJI vs BABURAJ regarding Recovery of possession, Mandatory injunction, Permanent Prohibitory Injunction and for damages.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 110/2022

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala

2025-08-06

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between N. P. Padmakumar et al vs Kasthurikuni Moidu Haji et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory and Mandatory Injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT 127/2014

Kozhikode District, Kerala

2025-08-07

approximately-11 years 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Subha Satheesh vs Prabha Raveendran et al regarding final decree application for partition

Final Decree Application

FDIA 5/2023 in OS 89/2022

Nadapuram, Kerala

2025-08-07

approximately-2 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9646

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-payment of Batta Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to provide adequate evidence to support their claims.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary procedural steps, leading to dismissal for inaction.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Dismissals occurred when petitioners were not present in court during hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-payment of Batta Fees

Insufficient Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken in Case

Absence of Petitioner in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?