Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 7/2025

Case between Ayissu vs Nellyamkandi Mammu et al regarding eviction of tenants

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-08-02
Duration
approximately-2 years
Case Closed
Sat, 08/02/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This Rent Control Petition is filed by Ayissu against Nellyamkandi Mammu and Muhammad for eviction due to cessation of occupation. The respondents have not paid rent and kept the shop room closed for more than 8 months.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition is allowed, directing the respondents to vacate the shop room within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of tenants and costs granted.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition is allowed, directing the respondents to vacate the shop room within 30 days.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the respondents ceased to occupy the shop room for more than 2 years without reasonable cause.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the respondents ceased to occupy the shop room for more than 2 years without reasonable cause.
Supporting Evidence
The primary burden is upon the landlord to prove that the respondent/tenant has ceased to occupy the petition schedule shop room for more than 6 months without reasonable cause. The commission report has clearly pointed out that the petition schedule shop room remained closed for more than 2 years without any reasonable cause.

Judgment Evidence:

The Rent Control Petition is allowed U/s 11(4)(v) of the Act and the respondents/tenants are directed to vacate the vacant possession of the shop room to the petitioner/landlord within a period of 30 days from the date of order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ayissu
Party Age
75
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nellyamkandi Mammu
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammad
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Kychit Agreement entered in between Ayissu, Mammu and Muhammad.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sri. I. Rajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondents from the shop room based on cessation of occupation.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed U/s 11(4)(v) of the Act and the respondents/tenants are directed to vacate the vacant possession of the shop room to the petitioner/landlord within a period of 30 days from the date of order.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The rent deed establishes the lease agreement between the petitioner and the respondents for the shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The commission report is used to prove cessation of occupation by the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Cessation of occupation
Case Code
Case between Ayissu vs Nellyamkandi Mammu et al regarding eviction of tenants
Case Code Year
Case between Ayissu vs Nellyamkandi Mammu et al regarding eviction of tenants

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 09/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 08/02/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kunhali Haji vs Fathimath Suhara regarding eviction of tenant
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. V. P. RAJAN vs 1Adv. V. T. PRADEEP KUMAR et al regarding eviction of tenant
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Viswanathan Karimbanathil vs Satheendran regarding eviction based on bonafide need.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Shoukkath. O. P vs Puthanpurayil Sasidharan regarding eviction of tenant for bonafide need.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between KUNHAMMAD HAJI KUNDANCHERI et al vs MUHAMMAD NAZIL regarding eviction of shop room.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won