| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1391 - 1395 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Rajappan vs MuraleedharanNair et al regarding declaration and injunction

Civil Suit

OS No. 762/2014

Kottayam, Kerala

2025-03-29

approximately-10 years 9 months 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/S Mathew and sons Finance vs Sreenivasan Nair K.S et al regarding recovery of loan amount.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 65/2025

Kottayam

2025-03-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abraham Benchamin vs M/s Anjali Traders et al regarding recovery of money as arrears of rent.

Civil Suit

O.S. 225/2023

Kottayam

2025-03-29

approximately-6 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Mathew and Sons Finance vs K. Sarumma et al regarding recovery of loan amount

Civil Suit

O.S No.375/2024

Kottayam

2025-03-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rajappan vs MuraleedharanNair et al regarding declaration and injunction.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 762/2014

Kottayam

2025-03-29

approximately-10 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence to prove their claims or the means of the respondents.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed due to plaintiffs' failure to pay necessary fees or batta for proceeding with their cases.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitioners' absence in court frequently led to dismissals of their cases.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Many cases were dismissed as plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?