| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1376 - 1380 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Boobily Peter vs Reliance Infratel Limited regarding injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 587/2023

Kottayam

2025-03-06

approximately-2 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Sooraj Soman regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 579/2022

Kottayam

2025-03-06

approximately-2 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Madhu K vs P.P Chandra Babu regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No.662/2017

Kottayam

2025-03-13

approximately-7 years 9 months 13 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Jomy Scaria vs Boby Thomas et al regarding restoration petition.

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 300138/2024

Kottayam

2025-03-13

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Uthup K Thomas vs Jayakumar K et al regarding injunction

Injunction

O.S No. 694/2018

Kottayam

2025-03-13

approximately-6 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required batta, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation

Dismissing cases due to the absence of plaintiffs or their representatives in court was common.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to present adequate evidence to support their claims or to demonstrate financial means.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Dismissing cases resulted from plaintiffs' failure to take necessary steps to issue required notices.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Representation

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?