| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1101 - 1105 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Chandrika vs Ancy Mariam Kurian regarding Review Petition

Review Petition

RCP.20/2020

Kottayam

2025-12-17

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Mr. Pradeep. P.P et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1/2023

Kottayam

2025-12-18

approximately-6 years 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Ms Radha cane Furniture et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 159/2025

Kottayam District

2025-12-18

approximately-3 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Mathews and Sons Finance vs Johnychan Mathew et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. 346/2024

Kottayam

2025-12-18

approximately-2 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Mrs.Arya. M et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. 421/2022

Kottayam

2025-12-19

approximately-6 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9644

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence

Plaintiffs often could not provide sufficient evidence regarding the means or claims against the defendants.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Dismissals frequently occurred due to plaintiffs not taking required procedural steps or actions in their cases.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation of Petitioner

Several cases were dismissed because the petitioner failed to appear or provide representation in court.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence

Failure to Take Steps

Non-Representation of Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?