Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RCP.20/2020

Case between Chandrika vs Ancy Mariam Kurian regarding Review Petition

Court
Additional Rent Control Court
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-12-17
Duration
Case Code No.
20
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Chandrika filed a Review Petition against Ancy Mariam Kurian regarding an order passed in a related Rent Control Petition. The court considered the delays in filing the review and the merits of the case.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The Review Petition is dismissed on merits and the delay in filing is condoned. The earlier order stands confirmed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The Review Petition is dismissed on merits and the delay in filing is condoned. The earlier order stands confirmed.
Key Reasoning:
No error apparent on the face of the record was established.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
This Court finds that no error apparent on the face of the record is established, no new or undiscoverable material is produced; and the Review Petition is an attempt to reopen issues already considered.

Judgment Evidence:

The Review Petition is not maintainable. R.P. No. 8 of 2025 is dismissed on merits.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chandrika
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ancy Mariam Kurian
Relation
D/o late Kurian, W/o Sony Mathews
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joseph Kurian
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sindhu Gopalakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
K.V Binod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The delay of 477 days in filing the Review Petition is condoned.
Evidence:
The delay of 477 days is condoned, in the interest of justice, subject to the merits of the Review Petition No. 8 of 2025.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The Review Petition is not maintainable.
Evidence:
The Review Petition is not maintainable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Document
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The document was marked and compared to the original during the proceedings.
Reference:
Ext. X-1

Case Classification

Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RCP.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V.J. Joseph vs Marykutty Varghese et al regarding Review Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Nagarajan G et al regarding review of dismissal order
COMMERCIAL COURT, PALA
Review Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between A.T Thomas vs Z. Scaria et al regarding review of judgment and decree rejecting the plaint.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Review Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between M B Ushakumariamma vs The Kottayam Wholesale Co Operative Consumer’s Stores Ltd. regarding Review Petition
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Review Petition Unknown
Case between Allianz Finance Corporation vs Biju K R regarding Review Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Review Petition Defendant Won