Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 421/2022

Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Mrs.Arya. M et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-12-19
Duration
approximately-6 years 5 months
Case Code No.
421
Case Closed
Fri, 12/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Self Employers Service Society, disbursed a loan to the defendants and is seeking repayment. The defendants have failed to repay the loan amount despite being issued a notice.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants are ordered to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of ₹65,848 along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants are ordered to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established their case through adequate evidence without any rebuttal from the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established their case through adequate evidence without any rebuttal from the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendants shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of ₹65,848 (Rupees Sixty Five Thousand Eight Hundred and Forty Eight only) along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Self Employers Service Society
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr.M.V Josekutty
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs.Arya. M
Party Age
28
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr.Sreejith.G
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr.Faisal. K. Muhammed
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr.Rajeev.M.R
Party Age
46
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application for 100000/- by Arya.M., Demand Promissory Note for Rs. 100000/- - executed by the Defendants.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Somaraj. S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E.S. Sukumaran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
It is ordered that the defendants shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of ₹65,848 along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendants shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of ₹65,848 (Rupees Sixty Five Thousand Eight Hundred and Forty Eight only) along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Loan Application for ₹100000/- by Arya.M.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Demand Promissory Note for ₹100000/- executed by the Defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement executed between the Plaintiff and the Defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The true copy of Lawyers notice issued to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Postal Receipts of the notices issued to the Defendants (4 numbers).
Reference:
Ext.A7 series
Document Type: Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Acknowledgement card signed by the Defendants 1, 2 and 4 (3 numbers).
Reference:
Ext.A8 series
Document Type: Photocopy of registration certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Photocopy of the Registration certificate of the plaintiff society.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Minutes of Meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True extract of the minutes of the meeting of the working committee.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Authorization letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Authorisation letter issued by the General secretary to Mr.Subhash C.K.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The computer printout of the Statement of account of the Plaintiff in the name of the 1st defendant as on 30.04.2022, 29.07.2019 to 30.04.2022.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2022

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Thu, 07/25/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 12/19/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Akhil Geevarghese Jose vs Soniya Mariyam Varghese et al regarding suit dismissal.
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Mathew and Sons Finance vs Siby Jacob @ Sibi et al regarding suit for decree in terms of compromise
Munsiff's Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Mathew and Sons Finance vs Thomas.J.S et al regarding compromise petition.
THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Shajimon Mathew vs Ayyappan et al regarding compromise petition
MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Omana Markose vs P.O Devarsykutty, Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited regarding temporary injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won