Case Summary
Shajimon Mathew filed a suit against Ayyappan and A Vinu. The court considered a compromise petition submitted by both parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the terms in the compromise and decreed the suit in those terms.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise were agreed upon by both parties.
The terms of the compromise were agreed upon by both parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise were agreed upon by both parties.
The terms of the compromise were agreed upon by both parties.
Supporting Evidence
The terms in the compromise is accepted and is recorded.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise. Compromise shall form part of the decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shajimon Mathew
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ayyappan
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- A Vinu
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Roy Vanchipurackal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. John George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise.
Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2021