| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1076 - 1080 of 21891

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/S Nebula Electricals vs Executive Engineer, P H Division KWA et al regarding recovery of money and other reliefs

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 239/2021

KOTTAYAM

2025-11-26

approximately-4 years 11 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Ali A K et al regarding realisation of money due from loan transaction.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 551/2023

Kottayam District

2025-11-26

approximately-5 years 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Self Employers Service Society Reg. No K 705/97 vs Biju Chacko et al regarding recovery of loan amount with interest.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 208/2023

Kottayam

2025-11-26

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shyamji V S vs V S Gopakumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 134/2021

Kottayam

2025-11-26

approximately-4 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jose K Joseph vs Ayarkunnam Grama Panchayath et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 682/2017

Kottayam

2025-11-27

approximately-8 years 0 days

Partial

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9644

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Petitioners frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 38 cases (38%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence regarding the means of the respondents contributed heavily to case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Frequent non-appearance of petitioners in court proceedings resulted in dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Omissions in taking procedural steps to issue notices and warrants led to many default dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?