Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 208/2023

Case between Self Employers Service Society Reg. No K 705/97 vs Biju Chacko et al regarding recovery of loan amount with interest.

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Judge
Smt. Indu P Raj
Order Date
2025-11-26
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 11/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff society sued the defendants for recovery of a loan amount of ₹1,44,526 with interest. The defendants contended that the amount was a charitable contribution and not a loan.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting them the recovery of the loan amount along with interest. The defendants' claims of a charitable contribution were rejected.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹1,44,526 from defendants jointly and severally and interest at 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting them the recovery of the loan amount along with interest. The defendants' claims of a charitable contribution were rejected.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence that the defendants had availed the loan and defaulted on repayment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence that the defendants had availed the loan and defaulted on repayment.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff discharged this burden by producing contemporaneous documents Exts.A1–A4, the statement of account Ext.A5, the cheque details, and the oral testimony of PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: The suit is decreed as follows, 1. Plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹1,44,526 from defendants 1 to 4 jointly and severally.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Self Employers Service Society Reg. No K 705/97
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biju Chacko
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Albin Joseph
Party Age
24
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Naveen K Joseph
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Amithu Reji
Party Age
26
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application, demand promissory note, consent letter, agreement, statement of accounts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Somaraj S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E S Sukumaran Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Santhosh Kesavanath P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the stated amount along with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff has succeeded in proving that the defendants jointly and severally availed the loan, executed the loan documents, received the cheque amount, and defaulted repayment.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to interest on the plaint amount.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to interest at 6% per annum on the plaint amount from the date of suit till realization.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.
Evidence:
For all these reasons, the suit deserves to be decreed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The loan application was submitted by the 1st defendant for a loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The promissory note executed by the defendants detailing their obligation to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Consent letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The consent letter signed by the defendants in conjunction with the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement executed between the plaintiff and the defendants regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The account statement showing the transactions and outstanding amounts due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyers notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice issued to the defendants regarding the debt collection.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipts for notices sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7 series
Document Type: Acknowledgement Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cards signed by defendant no 2 and 4 acknowledging receipt of notices.
Reference:
Ext.A8 series
Document Type: Returned Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice that was returned undelivered to defendant no. 3.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Bylaw of the Society
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The governing rules under which the plaintiff society operates.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The official registration certificate of the plaintiff society.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Extract of minutes
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document providing the minutes of the working committee meeting.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Letter of Authorization
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter authorizing a member to represent the society in court.
Reference:
Ext.A13

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Self Employers Service Society Reg. No K 705/97 vs Biju Chacko et al regarding recovery of loan amount with interest.
Case Code Year
Case between Self Employers Service Society Reg. No K 705/97 vs Biju Chacko et al regarding recovery of loan amount with interest.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Fri, 03/13/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 11/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Charitable Society

Similar Cases

Case between Biby John vs Swapna Ibrahimkutty et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd. vs Soniya Roy et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mathew Skariah et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Sinimol M.M., Dileep E.J., Shajimon E.B., Aradhana P.S. regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Pukadiyil Traders et al vs Bimlesh Kumar Sigh regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won