Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 239/2021

Case between M/S Nebula Electricals vs Executive Engineer, P H Division KWA et al regarding recovery of money and other reliefs

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Judge
Smt. Indu P Raj
Order Date
2025-11-26
Duration
approximately-4 years 11 months
Case Closed
Wed, 11/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, M/S Nebula Electricals and K J Raju, are seeking recovery of money from the defendants, including the Executive Engineer of KWA and the Government of Kerala. The case revolves around an electrical contract related to the supply and erection of a pump set that the defendants allegedly failed to pay for.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiffs for recovery of money, stating that the plaintiffs did not prove completion of work as per the contract. It was also found that they were barred by limitation from claiming the amount.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiffs for recovery of money, stating that the plaintiffs did not prove completion of work as per the contract. It was also found that they were barred by limitation from claiming the amount.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to prove completion of work and the case was barred by limitation.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs failed to prove completion of work and the case was barred by limitation.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has not proved completion as per the contract. Entitlement flows from proof of performance.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: the suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/S Nebula Electricals
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K J Raju
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Executive Engineer, P H Division KWA
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Kerala Water Authority
Relation
represented by its Managing Director
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Government of Kerala
Relation
represented by District Collector
Plaintiffs Documents
Work order No.AB4-1896/03, Tender agreement No. 36/EE/PHK/03-04
Defendants Documents
Original work order No AB4.1896/03, Reply notice

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joshy Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K M George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiffs sought recovery of the balance contract amount.
Evidence:
In view of the adverse findings on Issue No.1, it is found that the plaintiff is not entitled to any reliefs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Work Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It contains the details of the work awarded to the plaintiffs under the ARWSS Programme.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: District Collector Proceedings
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It provides context regarding administrative actions related to the project.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter from Assistant Executive Engineer
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It relates the instructions for the project execution.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter to District Collector
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It includes correspondence regarding the project's payment and approvals.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Suit Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Formally notifies the defendants regarding the suit.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Reply Notice from Executive Engineer
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides the defendants' response to the plaintiffs' claims.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Bill File
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Contains documentation related to the financial aspects of the contract.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Tender Agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Details the original agreement for the work.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Work Order
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original work order issued for the project.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original agreement related to the project execution.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Acknowledges the plaintiffs' claims and provides the defendants' stance.
Reference:
Ext.B4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/S Nebula Electricals vs Executive Engineer, P H Division KWA et al regarding recovery of money and other reliefs
Case Code Year
Case between M/S Nebula Electricals vs Executive Engineer, P H Division KWA et al regarding recovery of money and other reliefs

Quick Facts

Location
KOTTAYAM
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 11/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Rosamma Sebastian et al regarding realization of money due from the defendants.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Biju M R vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other consequential reliefs.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Punjab National Bank vs M/s Cafe Diaries et al regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India, Ernakulam Branch represented by its Chief Manager, Jayesh P vs Thereesa et al regarding realization of money
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Mohammed Mavadigothi regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won