Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 298/2022

Case between Canara Bank vs Rosamma Sebastian et al regarding realization of money due from the defendants.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PALA
Judge
Sri. Hasheem S
Order Date
2025-10-28
Duration
approximately-10 years 1 month
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against Rosamma Sebastian and Biji Sebastian to recover ₹4,97,450/- due under a loan. The defendants failed to repay the amount despite several demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing recovery of the loan amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹4,97,450/- with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing recovery of the loan amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved their case through testimony and relevant documentation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved their case through testimony and relevant documentation.
Supporting Evidence
In the absence of any contradictory evidence and relying on the oral testimony of PW1 and Exts.A1 to A6 documents, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved their case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of ₹4,97,450/- with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till realisation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rosamma Sebastian
Party Age
82
Relation
W/o Sebastian Thomas
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biji Sebastian
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o Sebastian Thomas
Plaintiffs Documents
Application of Agricultural Credit of Syndicate Bank, Agreement for Agricultural Advance of Syndicate Bank, Deed Guarantee for Agricultural Advance of Syndicate Bank, Acknowledgment of Debt for all types of Facilities By Borrower/Sureties, Acknowledgment of debt for all types Facilities by Borrower/Securities, Certificate of Canara Bank.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. K. Sebastian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Emmanuel John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anupama Jolly
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Cyriac James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹4,97,450/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of ₹4,97,450/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Ninety Seven Thousand Four Hundred and Fifty Only) from the defendants with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till realisation.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is also entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Application of Agricultural Credit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is related to the loan application submitted by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement for Agricultural Advance
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms agreed upon for the agricultural loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Deed Guarantee for Agricultural Advance
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a guarantee by the defendant's son for the repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the defendant's acknowledgment of the debt owed to the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document further confirms the defendant's acknowledgment of the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certificate of Canara Bank
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document certifies the legitimacy of the bank's claim for the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Rosamma Sebastian et al regarding realization of money due from the defendants.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Rosamma Sebastian et al regarding realization of money due from the defendants.

Quick Facts

Location
Pala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Case Filed
Fri, 09/11/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/28/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between M/S Nebula Electricals vs Executive Engineer, P H Division KWA et al regarding recovery of money and other reliefs
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Maker Village, Kerala Technology and Infrastructure Zone, Kinfra Hi Tech park, Kalamassery vs M/s Wahoo Technologies private limited et al regarding recovery of money.
I Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Punjab National Bank vs M/s Cafe Diaries et al regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India, Ernakulam Branch represented by its Chief Manager, Jayesh P vs Thereesa et al regarding realization of money
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Mohammed Mavadigothi regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won