| Niyamam AI

Displaying 761 - 765 of 21881

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between T.S.Baby vs K.A.Asha regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.71/2021

Vaikom

2025-02-19

approximately-3 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vijayasree vs Thyagarajan regarding injunction

Civil Suit

O S 13/2024

Vaikom Taluk

2025-02-18

approximately-1 year 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Ltd. vs Rajimol et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.174/2024

2025-02-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Thomas Ulahannan et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.246/2023

Vaikom Taluk, Kottayam District

2025-02-28

approximately-6 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Vishnu Valsan et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.264/2024

Vaikom Taluk, Kottayam District

2025-02-27

approximately-5 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9639

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta, leading to petition dismissals for default.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's inability to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

The absence of plaintiffs during court proceedings resulted in several case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices, which led to case dismissals.

Found in 13 cases (13%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?