Case Summary
Vaikathappan Nidhi Ltd. is the plaintiff represented by its Managing Director CK.Praveen, who sued the defendants Rajimol and Nidheesh regarding the non-repayment of a loan sanctioned for self-employment. The defendants defaulted on their repayments, leading to this suit for recovery of the outstanding amount.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff’s firm is allowed to realize the plaint claim of Rs.9,128/- and 9% interest from the date of the suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the amount claimed along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff has provided un rebutted evidence establishing the case.
The plaintiff has provided un rebutted evidence establishing the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff has provided un rebutted evidence establishing the case.
The plaintiff has provided un rebutted evidence establishing the case.
Supporting Evidence
From the un rebutted evidence adduced by the plaintiff’s firm, I hold that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief as prayed for.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The plaintiff’s firm is allowed to realize the plaint claim of Rs.9,128/- (Nine Thousand One Hundred and Twenty Eight Only) and also to realize 9% interest from the defendants and their assets from the date of the suit ie, 25.06.2024 till realization.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vaikathappan Nidhi Ltd.
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajimol
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nidheesh
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of resolution of Director Board meeting dated 05.01.2024, Original promissory note dated 08.07.2022, Office copy of lawyer’s notice dated 22.01.2024, Returned unclaimed notice, Acknowledgment card.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.G.Pradeepan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Chaithaya.K.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's claim to recover Rs.9,128/- along with interest from defendants.
Evidence:
I hold that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief as prayed for.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certified copy of resolution of Director Board meeting
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the authority of the plaintiff's firm in the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Original promissory note
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served as the primary evidence of the loan arrangement between the plaintiff and the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Office copy of Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicated the defendants were formally notified about the loan repayment due.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Returned Unclaimed Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrated that the defendants evaded the service of notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided evidence of communication attempts with the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Ltd. vs Rajimol et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Ltd. vs Rajimol et al regarding realisation of money