Case Summary
This case involves a financial dispute between the plaintiff, Suresh Kumar.K., and the defendant, Jiss Cheriyan. The plaintiff supplied goods to the defendant's firm and sought repayment of the owed amount.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed to realise Rs.82,715/- with 9% interest from the date of the suit till realisation.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the claimed amount plus interest. The plaintiff's firm successfully established its case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's case was supported by unrebutted evidence and documentation.
The plaintiff's case was supported by unrebutted evidence and documentation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's case was supported by unrebutted evidence and documentation.
The plaintiff's case was supported by unrebutted evidence and documentation.
Supporting Evidence
From the unrebutted evidence adduced by plaintiff, I hold that the plaintiff’s firm is entitled to the relief as prayed for.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The plaintiff’s firm is allowed to realise the plaint claim of Rs.82,715/- (Eighty Two Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifteen only) and also to realise 9% interest from the defendant from the date of the suit ie, 29.07.2023 till realisation.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suresh Kumar.K.
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jiss Cheriyan
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Lawyers notice dated 05.11.2021, Postal Receipt, A/D card, Reply notice issued by the defendant’s firm dated 19.11.2021
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.P.Muraleedharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff’s firm is allowed to realise the plaint claim of Rs.82,715/- along with interest.
Evidence:
I hold that the plaintiff’s firm is entitled to the relief as prayed for.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Lawyers notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued to demand the repayment of the amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the sending of the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
A/d Card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the receipt of the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Reply Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Contains the defendant's response regarding the repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Suresh Kumar.K. vs Jiss Cheriyan regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Suresh Kumar.K. vs Jiss Cheriyan regarding realisation of money