| Niyamam AI

Displaying 20416 - 20420 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Thazhathayil Saneeb vs Kadavathakath Muhammed et al regarding injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 34 OF 2017

2017-02-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Krishana. M. Jayesh vs Kerala state et al regarding Suit for injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 35 of 2017

2017-02-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Odengelath Subhadra vs Odengelath Sukumarn regarding injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 197 OF 2015

Tirur Taluk

2017-02-28

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Chamakkunnil Kari Muhammed Faisal vs Noushad regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.52 OF 2016

Tirur Taluk

2017-02-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Saidalavi vs Binu.M.K regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 81 OF 2015

2017-02-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Necessary Evidence

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove necessary facts.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Many cases were dismissed for default due to the failure to pay necessary court fees or batta.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitioners frequently failed to appear in court, leading to dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices to respondents.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Necessary Evidence

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?