Case Summary
Saidalavi filed a Rent Control Petition against Binu.M.K. The petitioner was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the petition for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner was absent and made no representation, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
The petitioner was absent and made no representation, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saidalavi
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Binu.M.K
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.K. Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.P. Basheer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.I.V. Rathish
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Petition dismissed for default due to absence of the petitioner.
Evidence:
Hence Petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Saidalavi vs Binu.M.K regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Saidalavi vs Binu.M.K regarding Rent Control Petition