Case Summary
The petitioners, consisting of Muhammed Abbas and three others, filed a rent control petition against the respondent Royison. The court dismissed the petition for default due to the absence of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the rent control petition due to the absence of the petitioners and their counsel, leading to a default judgment.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Abbas
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nadirsha
- Party Age
- 23
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Adilsha
- Party Age
- 22
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Parveen
- Party Age
- 18
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Royison
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Sreehari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The petition was dismissed for default due to absence of petitioners and their counsel.
Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Abbas et al vs Royison regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Abbas et al vs Royison regarding Rent Control