RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.64 OF 2016

Case between Muhammed Abbas et al vs Royison regarding Rent Control

Court

COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2017-02-04

Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)

Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, consisting of Muhammed Abbas and three others, filed a rent control petition against the respondent Royison. The court dismissed the petition for default due to the absence of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court dismissed the rent control petition due to the absence of the petitioners and their counsel, leading to a default judgment.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammed Abbas (48 years) Kadavath Puthanpurayil House, Thalakkad amsom, desom, Post B.P. Angadi, Tirur Taluk Nadirsha (23 years) Kadavath Puthanpurayil House, Thalakkad amsom, desom, Post B.P. Angadi, Tirur Taluk Adilsha (22 years) Kadavath Puthanpurayil House, Thalakkad amsom, desom, Post B.P. Angadi, Tirur Taluk Parveen (18 years) Kadavath Puthanpurayil House, Thalakkad amsom, desom, Post B.P. Angadi, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Royison (51 years) Cheruvathoor House, Pengamukku amsom and desom, Thalappalli Taluk, C/o. Cheruvathoor Electricals, B.P. Angadi

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

The petition was dismissed for default due to absence of petitioners and their counsel.

Evidence: