ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 34 OF 2017

Case between Thazhathayil Saneeb vs Kadavathakath Muhammed et al regarding injunction.

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2017-02-28

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Thazhathayil Saneeb and his wife Rasheed filed a suit for injunction against Kadavathakath Muhammed and others. The parties reached a compromise regarding access to land.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

3 feet way on the easter extreme end of defendants property.

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit for injunction was decreed as per the terms of the compromise, allowing a 3 feet way for the plaintiff's access.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of compromise are lawful.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

The terms of compromise are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Since the terms of compromise is lawful, the suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Thazhathayil Saneeb
Party Age: 33
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Rasheed
Party Age: 28
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kadavathakath Muhammed
Party Age: 58
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Muhsin
Party Age: 26
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Beeyyumma
Party Age: 56
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Compromise petition IA.577/2017.

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. K. Vipin
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. V. Sreeraj
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Suit for injunction granted as per the terms of the compromise.

Evidence: