| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17716 - 17720 of 22137

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between ICICI Bank Ltd vs Jinu James Kandathil et al regarding a suit under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.549/2022

Ernakulam

2025-01-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Service Co operative Bank Keezhillam vs M P Sabu et al regarding execution petition

Execution Petition

E.P. 161/2023

Perumbavoor

2025-11-17

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Asharaf Hydrose et al vs Noby Augustine regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 111/2024

Ernakulam

2025-01-31

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mrs. K.C Komalavalli et al vs Sajid Edpatta et al regarding dismissal of suit.

O.S No. 72/2024

Ernakulam

2025-01-31

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs N. K Salim et al regarding suit rejection

Civil Suit

O. S. No.417/2020

Perumbavoor

2025-11-27

approximately-5 years 6 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9764

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Absence of Evidence

Many cases were dismissed due to lack of sufficient evidence regarding the financial means of respondents.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Non-Representation of Plaintiffs

Plaintiffs often did not attend court proceedings, resulting in dismissals for default.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Plaintiffs' failure to issue necessary court notices led to numerous case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Evidence

Non-Representation of Plaintiffs

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?