Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
E.P. 161/2023

Case between Service Co operative Bank Keezhillam vs M P Sabu et al regarding execution petition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-11-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Service Co operative Bank Keezhillam filed an execution petition against M P Sabu and others. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed, indicating that it was fully satisfied.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was dismissed as not pressed, indicating the matter was satisfactorily resolved.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The execution petition was not pressed by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence EP dismissed as not Pressed as fully satisfied.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Service Co operative Bank Keezhillam (Age not specified years)

Defendants

M P Sabu (50 years years) Maragadan House, Pulluvazhi P O, Pulluvazhi Kara, Rayamangalam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Eldo Mathai (50 years years) Pazhambilly House, Pulluvazhi P O, Pulluvazhi Kara, Rayamangalam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Pushpa P M (51 years years) Pazhambilly House, Pulluvazhi P O, Pulluvazhi Kara, Rayamangalam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
EP not Pressed as fully satisfied.
Evidence:
EP not Pressed vide endorsement on the petition. Hence EP dismissed as not Pressed as fully satisfied.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases