Case Summary
The Service Co operative Bank Keezhillam filed an execution petition against M P Sabu and others. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed, indicating that it was fully satisfied.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed as not pressed, indicating the matter was satisfactorily resolved.
Key Reasoning:
The execution petition was not pressed by the plaintiff.
The execution petition was not pressed by the plaintiff.
Why Defendant Won:
The execution petition was not pressed by the plaintiff.
The execution petition was not pressed by the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The petition having been finally heard before me on 17/11/2025 and the court on the same day passed the following: EP not Pressed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence EP dismissed as not Pressed as fully satisfied.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Service Co operative Bank Keezhillam
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M P Sabu
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Eldo Mathai
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pushpa P M
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- George Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Akhil Babu
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
EP not Pressed as fully satisfied.
Evidence:
EP not Pressed vide endorsement on the petition. Hence EP dismissed as not Pressed as fully satisfied.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
E.P.
Case Code Year
2023