Case Summary
The petitioners, Asharaf Hydrose and Sheila Asharaf, filed a rent control petition against the respondent Noby Augustine. The matter was settled with the respondent vacating the premises, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed after the respondent vacated the premises.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Asharaf Hydrose
- Party Age
- 76
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sheila Asharaf
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Noby Augustine
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sabu Pullan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Asharaf Hydrose et al vs Noby Augustine regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Asharaf Hydrose et al vs Noby Augustine regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement