R.C.P. No. 111/2024

Case between Asharaf Hydrose et al vs Noby Augustine regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Asharaf Hydrose and Sheila Asharaf, filed a rent control petition against the respondent Noby Augustine. The matter was settled with the respondent vacating the premises, leading to the dismissal of the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed after the respondent vacated the premises.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Asharaf Hydrose (76 years) Flat No.7A, Anzeera Lavendor Apartments, Rajagiri Valley (PO), Kakkanad. Pin 682039 Sheila Asharaf (68 years) Flat No.7A, Anzeera Lavendor Apartments, Rajagiri Valley (PO), Kakkanad. Pin 682039

Defendants

Noby Augustine (Age not specified years) Shop No. A17, Door No.67/4786 (Old No.40/1819), Ground Floor, Alliance Residency, Marine Drive, Ernakulam, Pin 682031

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases