| Niyamam AI

Displaying 286 - 290 of 21813

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between A.K.Nazimudeen vs Shaima Shaharudeen et al regarding Partition

Civil Suit

OS. No. 465/2023

Kollam

2025-07-16

approximately-1 year 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vijayakrishnan Nair @ Babu vs John regarding temporary injunction

Civil Suit

OS No. 356/2023

KOLLAM

2025-07-17

approximately-2 years 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Gopinathan Pillai vs M.K.Sundaran Pillai regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 565/2018

Kollam

2025-07-18

approximately-10 years 23 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s.Canara Bank vs Syju.S. regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 691/2024

Kollam

2025-07-18

approximately-6 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.G.Aravindakshan Nair vs Adv.Salmath et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 697/2018

Kollam

2025-07-19

approximately-7 years 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9605

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Petitioners failed to pay the required batta leading to default dismissals.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove means of payment.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Case was dismissed due to the petitioner's inaction regarding notice issuance or representation.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed because the petitioners did not appear in court when required.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?